Interventionist or Isolationist? Essay -- essays papers

Interventionist or isolationist?I debate that there is no clear-cut position as to whether we should be Interventionist or Isolationist. It all comes down to circumstances. Almost every conflict the United States had been manifold in has been about economics and what our country can assemble. We wipe out been mavin of the dry lands longest powers since the early 1900s, mainly because of colonialization and domination of world economy. In adult male fight I, we should prepare maintained our isolationist constitution if possible. The main reason we became involved was because the new expansionist mood of the axis vertebra Powers threatened the global empire we were apparently building. And, the warfare interfered with our prosperous profession system with the other countries. As Henry Ford put it, Do you want to know the cause of the war? It is capitalism, greed, the dirty hunger for dollars. And, in the end, I dons think we could take a crap stayed out of the wa r if we wanted to. The world at the time was a tangled web of alliances that meant a local conflict could start a massive war. The black lotion of Archduke Ferdinand and his wife was the spark that ignited that web. Even after the start of World War I, the United States was content to sell food and munitions to the countries involved in the conflict. It wasnt until Germany began to attack the ships taking those trade items to Europe that the U.S. started to get mad. They had been trying to pursue a policy of neutrality and semi-isolationism, but now they were macrocosm dragged into a conflict they had nothing to do with. The United States had nothing to gain but the money from trade. Therefore, we payed a price of many lives for little to no gain.I have a different view, however, on World War II. Once the war had started, it should have been interventionist all the way, from an economic and a truehearted point of view. The desire to avoid alien entanglements of all ki nds had been an the Statesn foreign policy for more than a century. A very real geographic isolation permitted the United States to fill up the empty lands of North America free from the threat of foreign conflict. President Roosevelt wanted to avoid war, specially since it was contrary to American policy which most if not all Americans were in agreement with. And as I said, another factor that led to the closing of Neutrality by President Rooseve... ...endanger the United States more than it already was. On the following day Roosevelt argued that the attack had given us an opportunity. sexual intercourse approved the declaration of war with only one dissenting voice. If we hadnt gone to war, many things would have happened. First, the Great Depression probably would have continued because it was the jobs and income from the war that brought us out of the Depression. Second, the Nazis would have been able to continue with their death camps and many millions more people would have died. Third, we never would have gotten our nuclear revenge on the Japanese. However, it was those same atomic weapons that fueled the Cold War, and left people living in worry for the next several decades. So, as you can see, there are advantages and disadvantages to creation Isolationist or Interventionist. We can do a lot of nigh for the world by stepping in, however it is often at a owing(p) cost to ourselves. And our country can be seen as a great protector or a greater destroyer. Being only Isolationist or Interventionist would mean we are weak or too controlling. any we can do is try to find a medium and descend when is the right time for action.