Cross Cultural Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words - 1

Cross Cultural Management - Essay ExampleThe airbus confederation gets its remuneration from a distinctive workforce that comprises more than eighty nationalities, and the employees speak over twenty languages. The factors that keep the airbus company a leading industry in the market are the hard work done by the employees, the companys vision and the human talent. The workforce at the airbus manufacturing company is geographically distributed in residual to national ownership. In case of economic nationalism, the government changes private transactions amid economic actors by segregating foreigners. This conduct to productive efficiency decrease. This is because of the differences in ways of communication and management styles (Silverthorne, 2005). For instance, comparing the French and the Germans, the latter were correct at finish making. On the other hand, the French mass preferred a centralized decision. tied(p) though the Spanish were flexible, they had an inferiority c omplex leading to a tendency to be unreliable and vague. The primary(prenominal) problem arose when the airbus company was created. It was mainly headed by French and Germans. Looking from the cultural dimensions from Hofstedes, the French people want air buses with high power distances while the Germans liked air buses with low power distances. In decision making, the Germans were interfering in serious conversations while it was disliked by the French people. This hurt the French people and created conflict between them. Due to the administration involvement in respective countries, there were delays in the hail cutting measures. This is because the state aid came to rescue their corresponding partners first. The power identification of the Germans and the French was distributed unevenly. The government was self-absorbed and was considering only its own motives. One of the main reasons that led to delays in launching airbus A380 for two consecutive geezerhood was the fact tha t complex writing design system was meant for it. There were one megabyte two century functions used in controlling the airbus that took forty thousand connectors and ninety eight thousand wires. Fifty thousand models are encompassed in the system which needs to be synchronized in various countries. This was time go through and complicated because the engineers were at different locations. Another problem was that the parts of the airbus were manufactured in different locations. An moral is that the nose sections of the airbus were manufactured in France, the wings in Britain, and fuselages in Germany (Silverthorne, 2005). The final assemblies were done in France. It increase communication problems, first and foremost, time consumption and transportation cost. There were problems with the software used in the breeding as well. The engineers in Spain and Germany were using older versions of V4 of the CAD program. They used it in designing the wiring system. On the other hand, eng ineers from England and France used V5, which was the latest version (Voich and Stepina, 2003). This led to a lot of troubles and delays in information transferring because the data was lost when transferring files and information from one system to the other. The French engineers were familiar with the software used while the Germans, on the other hand, were not experienced. Jackson (2004) reveals that the French were considered to be individualistic because they were not concerned about the learn of the related partner companies. Because there was no integration in engineering